It offered a more stripped back feature set than the M240, but it does still have live view. Source: DxOMark. I typically use a 75mm lens on my M 262. The 262 probably has a more stable power management, resulting in less banding and thus better high ISO performance. On same first menus screen can have File Format to pick DNG or DNG+JPG or JPG only.When you get the M10 Ill be interested to hear how you like the B&W jpg vs. your Monochrome. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). I completely agree about the thumb rest, adds more (in a bad way) than removing the screen takes away, in my opinion. I have found that the shadows in the M10 can be pulled forever, which is great, because both cameras have about the same capacity to blow highlight details. Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. I also dont shoot flash and I dont bracket, so really the only part of the set-menu thats of use to me is the ISO settings, and the ISO settings have their own dedicated button. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. Verified purchase: Yes | Condition . To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. The M240 is wide and bulky. This is an inspiring and generous website. If not, get the 262. Compared to when I shot with any other camera system, my gut feeling is I come away with fewer shotsless spray and pray . More battery power can be an indication of longer battery life. I've always wanted a Leica and was thinking of picking up a used M262 or M240 to replace my Fuji. In the run up to buying an M10 Ive been reading a lot of reviews, and have found the M262 is rarely mentioned in them. You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO. This made me think; maybe I could get on with the video features too? https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. Weight is certainly a thing though! Either way, its the M262 that I want to keepif(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_18',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Though I must admit, this experience has had me thinking that an M10 would be better suited to me now. Theres a certain robustness or heft to the M240/M262 files that I personally dont see in the M10 files, and that is likely a result of the different sensors used in the cameras. Clear editor. Why poor white balance, plus bad color in JPEG files, for Q2 camera? Intro Sample Images Lenses Specs Performance. I cant keep it my business partner has vetoed that idea. Water-resistant devices can resist the penetration of water, such as powerful water jets, but not being submerged into water. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Other new features include an expanded ISO range of 100 to 50000, 16 minute maximum exposure time, dynamic range equivalent of 13.5 stops, an on-screen level gauge, and super quiet . Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. That said, M10 GAS is real. The model omits the Typ 240's live view and video capabilities, and has a much simpler menu structure and one-button access to . Got a spare lottery ticket? Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. Then along comes the M262, digital Leica I'd been waiting for. But, as someone who shoots, buys and sells a lot of different lenses, the bigger screen would definitely offer me an advantage Id be able to take photos and check lenses were calibrated properly etc. The only shortcoming relating to the auto ISO function is that sometimes I feel like Id like to be able to see the ISO the camera is choosing on a shot by shot basis. Some cards are woefully slow. The shutter and cocking mechanism are much quieter than in the earlier and higher-priced M Typ 240, and allow two frames per second to be recorded in single shot mode. And thats pushing it. Heres some photos: Bear in mind, these have been taken with a load of different lenses:if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-leader-3','ezslot_21',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-3-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-leader-2','ezslot_20',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-2-0'); In conclusion, the Leica M262 is a fantastic camera with a great interface with very few issues worth picking holes in. I have a X113 and an M262. One is not better or worse than the other, they are just different. For the M240, forget it. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. The Leica M-D (Typ 262) ($5,995) is the camera for photographers who wish that digital didn't happen. Let's try another side by side Leica Monochrom - 50 Lux - click for larger and crop - Leica M 240 - click for larger. Thats why the M-D 262 and the M 262 have the same type name. Id prefer to do this with the Leica as its the camera I use most often and so the battery is always charged with space on a memory card. Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. Im still getting used to it, but for me a 2 issues, weight with a big 50mm lens and editing the files you really bring out the image quality as it seems a bit flat to me. You cannot paste images directly. Ive decided to sell my Leica M typ 262, so I thought it about time I write a bit of a post about it. Yura, I still use both with other M along. Can you advice,please, if you still own both cameras: why some people says that m262 perform better colors? I find it to be a useful feature at times. https://www.dailycameranews.com/, ShakeSphere Portable Blender E-Lid review, Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: A Solid but Unremarkable Upgrade. Im an auto-ISO guy so the dial is nice for the little I use it. All the added features that the M240 brought to the table didnt really appeal to me, and specifically because I didnt think I was interested in live view, I felt that all the M10 could offer me was an ISO dial. With the wrong card, the wait before the shutter is again available is bad. Of course Im now retired and not doing imaging for a living. This screen has very good focus peaking and an exposure waveform overlay that I find invaluable! By Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. If not, moderators please delete this post. Im really enjoying this site since discovering it! Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. A simple exterior is my kind of camera- adverts belong on billboards, not on cameras. Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. Without even thinking about it, I started using the live-view. Material choices as well as the overall fit and finish are second to none. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. To each his own, indeed!Ive never seen one in real life mad to think Ive ordered a camera of that value without handling it. I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! This happens with the M240 from time to time. I remember having an unexpected opportunity to fondle the M10, when it was first promoted, when a Leica rep. happened to visit my favorite camera shop. It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. Adjusting colours always feels like a headache, but is one Ive broadly avoided with this camera. I find it very quick. It depends on your needs. I sometimes shot movies and it was amazing. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. You and Roger Hicks. Damn digital cameras I can control film camera GAS quite well these days, but these digital buggers still get me! The controls are easy to change while the camera is at your eye. Its just become a reason not to use the screen as much as I might have. A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. And if you are not interested in movies or EVF, as a.Noctilux said, you can ignore them. Loomis77December 27, 2020 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. With the M9, just going out for a day I would take two batteries. If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. It might be a step backwards in volume of features, but it was a step in the right direction in terms what I think a Leica camera should stand for. Here are my thoughts on the M240 alongside my second hand and limited knowledge of the M10. On 12/27/2020 at 11:24 AM, a.noctilux said: On 12/27/2020 at 12:24 PM, a.noctilux said: Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount , https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. I didnt discover this, despite that being how the M9 works. Thank you @Jeff Sfor this and also your sage comments re not having to use video and not having to use LV on the M240. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to . There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! I was wrong! So, yeah, as I said, video is just not something I want to do with a Leica M camera! Why torture yourself? The renderings are quite good as a whole, and this feature is not contained in the M10 which relegates one to only the lens filter option.Card Writing Speed. Really useful! For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. I then had a feeling that Im sure a lot of people who have too many cameras have once in a while You might know it yourself? Upload or insert images from URL. To make pictures, those are good bodies to be used with good lens. I think everyone gave great suggestions, I went with a new 262, love the shutter and simplicity compared to the 240. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_12',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); As it turned out, I would find more advantages with the Leica M262 when I got it. A fetish with the M10 is its simplified menu. While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). That said, I dont shoot Leicas for rapidity.Start Up. Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. M-E "CCD" M9 M9-P CCD. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! Is the 262 different in this regard? High ISO performance a must wish it was even better. But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. Ive had it for years and purchased it when M8s were at their lowest prices. With the ISO being menu driven, its also very possible to accidentally leave it on a too-high setting. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. More about being to see the settings at a glance, rather than just be able to change them easily. Like most people, I suspect. If live view/video is a don't care then buy the lower cost camera. Indeed, I am an m10 owner who misses my m9. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. The focus motor moves the lens in order to autofocus. The menu is cut and dry. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. One review even suggested that the M10 should be called the M11, with the M240 rightfully being the M10. I remember initially thinking that the colours coming out of the M10 files seemed thin when compared to those of the M240 and the photos in your review of the M262 have reminded me of that. Its funny, the M262 seems to be the Leica camera that people forget. At0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. BTW the battery life of a charge is awesome. When using the M10 in aperture priority mode I dial the EV down to -0.7. Expanded ISO allows you to go beyond the native ISO. The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. Without a magnifier piece.comfortable view is 50-35mm. - Leica M 262 & Voigtlnder 50/1.2. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M6 Classic & Leica M6 TTL A Review of Both Variants, Leica M8 (Finally) Falling in love with this aging digital By Taffy Ledesma, Leica IIf Red Dial: Nostalgia, or Tool for Serious Storytelling? Image quality will be essentially the same. Basically, Im sold on live-view these days but, despite this fact, I didnt think it would appeal to me on a Leica. I'm not sure if it's ok to show a snapshot of the LFI article. The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. Sometimes, colours from M262 can be a bit more saturated than from M240, but as I use them only in recording DNG, post work can do what I want. I find the M262 colours different enough from the M-P I just sold - to my eye the blues, reds, aquas and purples feel denser. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. And thats pushing it. Even though this image set was only intentionally overexposed by a single stop in direct sunlight, the highlights from the image samples taken by the Leica M246 and the Leica M Monochrom were blown and unrecoverable in post processing. It does make me wonder if they could have slimmed down this body like the M10, were they to have released this camera as a major upgrade rather than a stripped-back sidestep from the M240. Best wishes to you all and thanks again for your help. Both should arrived this coming week and so I am getting very excited! The Leica M240 has done me proud whilst the M262 has been away, though the experience has not be without a couple of surprises, so I thought Id write a little bit about what Ive found.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_9',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); First off, I should probably say that this isnt going to be a proper review Ive written so many reviews about Leica rangefinder cameras and their subtle differences that the idea of writing my thoughts about every facet of this camera just doesnt appeal at all and thats despite this one having more to offer than any that Ive shot before. So, the obvious question: why not the M10-D? Of course there will be technological advances and all kinds of new features. Its based on the body of the M240, but as Ive said, when it was released it was pitched as a more affordable stripped-back camera with less features. On the M240 the highlight from focus peaking is often not apparent at all. As mentioned, one of the big selling points Leica hung their marketing angle off when launching the Leica M262 was the reduction of menu options to 2 screens compared to the M240. One has a brightline window, the other does not. Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. When I was looking at replacing my M9 with a newer model which I did in large part for the benefit of a better screen on the back I chose to skip the Leica M240 due to the fact that I didnt feel like the swathe of features it had compared to the later M262 offered me any advantage. The big round dial on the back of the M9 was always tricky to use. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. As an M10 owner I should say that yes, this camera is definitely a less is more sort of gadget. Nice write-up. This has become a bit of a trend now, I buy a digital Leica, shoot with it for a while, decide to sell it for one reason or another, and then scramble to write about it in the final few days of owning it. Since most reviews are quite large in content thanks to extensive coverage, comparisons to other cameras and large sample images, they span across multiple pages for easier reading experience. In case you're confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions. Now, if the shutter was fully mechanical and cocked by hand that would be a very different thing. Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. Pasted as rich text. Be the first. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. The higher the movie recording bitrate the better the movie quality with more and crispier details and less compression artifacts. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. I do think the 262 files have an edge over the 240. I have preview turned off too and use it like I do my M6. Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen's image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. In fact, there was a time when I swore I didnt need anything more. I really have found it quite distracting to have an image preview thats different to what Im used to, especially since its both inaccurate and in a way thats unappealing to my tastes. Great article as always! I have both and haven't noticed any difference but I haven't done a side by side comparison. Yeah, I edit all my digital images, so I guess I dont really think about that. I like to put my camera to my eye this live-view lark just doesnt appeal to me was the sort of sentence I likely uttered. The thing is, I much prefer the warm display on the M262. The even newer M-P Typ 240 purchase just opens up addtional opportunities of using a digital M as a multi-purpose tool. My budget is c. 3,000 for the camera and lens. I shot film forever and my M2 was my first range finder. Image Quality. I posted this as a person of experience. Edward - you are right about the blues and reds. Theres very little real difference between the two cameras so it really depends on what you can find to suit your budget - I certainly wouldnt hold out for one if you can find the other in decent condition. The M262 was not available when I bought my my M240 but if I was buying now I would still go for the M240. This page contains all hands-on, detailed Camera Reviews that have been published at Photography Life. This was a heretical change from earlier Leicas. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. Whats the best camera for around $2000? The Leica M-D Typ 262 was released in 2016 and is already rather difficult to find. Press and hold, select ISO, and release to lock in the setting. The sensor is still not what I would consider great (or even competitive) in regards to dynamic range and high ISO quality, perhaps I was just spoiled by the incredible capabilities of the Nikon Df. My justification for upgrading from the M9 to the Leica M262 was almost more ridiculous than the justifications Im hanging my decisions off moving from M262 to M10. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10. The body is pretty well weather sealed. Weight savings from the M10 may be there, but with a Thumbs Up in the hot shoe, the M240 feels good and substantial in the hand.ISO setting. Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. I have a Fuji X100f and stripped down the OVF/EVF data and shoot in manual with manual focus only to give it a M2 feel. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. JPG Settings can be on the user assignable first screen and from that quickly turn on/off Monochrome. Hi Hamish, I have used an M240 extensively for the last 18 months. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. In the real world, I was making the M9 work for me in terms of low light shooting, as such, I have literally never found a single issue with high ISO noise from the M262. As I said at the end of that post, I then found myself in with a big chuck of the dreaded GAS. The M10 has the new ISO wheel on the top left. A personal taste thing of course, but youd think that a Leica camera would have a screen that was at least mostly accurate to the end photo? I guess that how much I miss the live-view will define how soon, if at all, I start saving my pennies for a swap. I cant even work out how to hold the Leica M240 for video, and whilst it has focus peaking, it certainly doesnt have the features the Atomos brings to the table. I dont mind adjusting contrast, thats just part of the process of me.